What a Tory Revival Needs

By Lord Hargreaves

I'd like to talk about the UK Conservative Party if I may:



In some respects the current Tory Leadership contest is rather asinine, because both Davids don't really disagree on much. Perhaps this is why I still haven't decided who to vote for, because of the lack of choice - yes, both sidesplay up their differences, but they are of style and method, not substance. Both agree that the Conservative Party's problem is one of image rather than policy.

Lets focus on one clear area of disagreement: tax policy. David Cameron, in his wisdom, has called for "the proceeds of growth to be shared between tax reduction and public services".

Eh?

It seems Cameron has not learned anything - when we call for lower taxes and increased public spending at the same time, voters usually scratch their heads and wonder "How does that work?"

Answer: It doesn't, not really.

In contrast, David Davis promises a 3% tax cut of £1,200. The reaction to this was largely a rather hysterical hissy-fit, and we were treated to warnings of how if we only focus on our "core vote" we were doomed to loose again. And this is over 3%!!! How can people say belief in conservatism is not dying before our eyes?

A Tory revival starts with a 10% tax cut.

I believe 10% is a good number to begin with but the prospect of further cuts must be kept in mind — and this is the beginning of economic wisdom, and we are the party of that. Economic initiatives must be encouraged for economic growth to happen. Yes, the Treasury will say that you must cut spending to make this possible. This insistence will make tax cuts impossible.

On social policy, I believe a Tory revival must incorporate Liam Fox's vision of addressing the "broken society". Left-Wing ideas about crime, immigration, health and education should be attacked and discredited. The family is one archetypically conservative institution and should be privileged as such. Cameron has mumbled something about tax benefits, but other than this the leaders seem all too silent.

A word on foreign policy. The Conservative party should announce that European integration has gone too far. A common European market is a good idea and those commonalities that emerge naturally among its members are usually good ideas as well. But what is developing is not a European union of nations but a transnational Europe with its political centre in Brussels. This is unacceptable — or should be — to the UK. Why is this so difficult to say?

Yes, it is absolutely essential for a Tory revival that we address public services, the environment and global poverty. However there is no need for our solutions to be left-wing. The public services require real choice, the environment can only be saved with technological solutions and not a subversion of capitalism, and global poverty can only be addressed with a defence of free trade and responsibility in the governments of recipient nations.

It is also essential we do not forget that our logo is the torch of liberty - We must begin to trust the people again - to manage their own money and their own lives. The best way to start this is to restore powers to local government, and allow elections for police comissioners, and perhaps judges too.

Our party has an excellent chance of winning the next election under either Cameron or Davis, like we had an excellent chance of winning in 1979 without Thatcher. We can always find ways to win elections. I am arguing that for a true revival of a party capable of building a legacy, we must do these things.

One other thing: a conservative party historically, in all countries, has been the patriotic nationalistic party. The Conservative party of Great Britain should celebrate this spirit. Fly the flag on school buildings - bring it on baby

The Ultimate Question

By Tetracide

The left are entertaining in the fact that they put all their energy into one matter, whichever is prominent at that moment, and consistently fail to succeed or at least leave the situation with a victorious light of which they crave.

Not too long ago we had the John Bolton nomination, where the Democrats were caught off guard while gussying up for the celebrating press conference, when the President appointed Mr. Bolton directly to the UN. To the left, John Bolton was a fascist, unethical, dirty old man, and not worthy of such a position. Putting their heart and soul into every speech, they painted that man as unfit for the job, and criticized the President for sending such an obvious moron to the likes of them. However, now, he isn’t talked about at all. We haven’t heard much about him, his business at the UN, and the policies he supports or denounces.

This brings up an interesting question. If Bolton was a spawn of Satan, like the left portrayed him and many others to be, why was he suddenly ignored once the opportunity to obstruct such an evil human being was much more difficult?

The left have amazing and admirable fidelity, whether it be tarnishing the wife and kids of a Supreme Court nominee, or the giddy publicizing of the 2,000 fallen American men and women in the armed service. If history respected the opposing parties of the time more, the modern left would certainly take the cake. Horrific comments made by their idols like Ted Kennedy, Dick Durbin, or Howard Dean were widely accepted or quietly ignored, highlighting the fact that they refuse to protect America on the political battlefield when it is so clearly under attack from within.

A shrug or a sigh is surly in order, but one cannot help but to think where the party of hate and obstruction is headed. The presidency?

In 2004, the harsh reminder that such anger and antagonism is not strong enough to win the hearts and minds of the American public was all too apparent. However, the left, in their attempt to analyze why the right won (not why they lost), they decided to not re-illustrate their base with their solid positions and values in the arena of ideas, but to rather deceive (Hillary Clinton) and continue to increase the size of their “hate base” (Harry Reed, and many others).

The ultimate question of life is “why?” and while three letters seems easy to say, type, and write, many if not all Americans are still confused in regards to the answer the left may provide to that question. They can run and hide from answering the question for as long as they want, but until they finally answer the silent majority; the voters; the people, they will never taste the sweet taste of power they so eagerly strive for.